Insurance giant accuses medical equipment suppliers of fraudulent billing scheme


In a significant legal development, a major insurance company has filed a lawsuit to combat what it alleges is an extensive fraudulent scheme exploiting New York's "No-Fault" insurance system. The complaint was lodged by Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and its subsidiaries in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on October 10, 2024, targeting multiple defendants including Surgut Leasing Corp., RVA Leasing Corp., Drak Medical Equipment, Inc., Taniyn Leasing Corp., Tatsu Leasing Corp., and several individuals.

The lawsuit accuses these entities and individuals of orchestrating the fraud to extract over $210,000 from GEICO through false claims for durable medical equipment (DME) that were either medically unnecessary or never provided. The defendants allegedly submitted millions of dollars in fraudulent charges related to items such as cold therapy units and TENS units under the guise of treating automobile accident victims insured by GEICO. According to the complaint, this operation was driven by unlawful financial arrangements between the defendants and unnamed co-conspirators.

GEICO asserts that the supplier defendants—retailers claiming to provide DME—are owned by Polina Radyushina, Tatiana Mejia Lineros, and Zhong Zhou. These so-called "Paper Owner Defendants" are accused of collaborating with others to secure prescriptions from various healthcare providers and using them to submit large volumes of fraudulent billing. The insurer claims these bills misrepresented the nature of the equipment provided and inflated reimbursement rates beyond permissible limits.

The plaintiffs seek not only recovery of funds wrongfully obtained but also a court declaration absolving them from paying over $1.7 million in pending claims tied to this alleged fraud. They argue that due to licensing violations, unlawful financial arrangements, lack of medical necessity, misrepresentation of services provided, and grossly inflated charges, they are not obligated to honor these claims.

Representing GEICO in this case are attorneys Barry I. Levy, Michael Sirignano, Michael Vanunu, and Alexandra Wolff from Rivkin Radler LLP. Case ID 1:24-cv-07137.

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Plaintiff Linkedto Partners LLC Accuses Digital Asset Firm DeFi Technologies Inc. of Securities Fraud

Linkedto Partners LLC has initiated a class-action lawsuit against DeFi Technologies Inc., accusing them of securities fraud by allegedly making false statements about their financial health between May and November of this year.


Plaintiff alleges auto dealer and bank conspired in deceptive financing scheme

In a lawsuit filed on December 5th in Brooklyn's Eastern District Court of New York against Generation Kia Inc., Esran L. Boothe claims he was misled into an inflated car financing deal through deceptive practices involving electronic contracts...


UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce business victimized by fraudsters sues The Moroccan Deal Inc., alleging deceptive investment scheme

In a striking legal move, UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce company based in New York City has filed a lawsuit against The Moroccan Deal Inc., accusing them along with two individuals of orchestrating a fraudulent investment scheme involving...