Trump Vows Strong Appeal Against $83.3 Million Defamation Verdict


E. Jean Carroll, Former President Donald Trump | File Photo

Former President Donald Trump, a pivotal figure in the Republican party and the 2024 Presidential race, has declared his intention to appeal the $83.3 million verdict awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll. This development follows a swift decision by a Manhattan jury, reached in less than three hours of deliberation.

Trump, who was present for most of the trial but absent for the verdict, voiced his opposition on social media. "Our Legal System is out of control and being used as a Political Weapon," he proclaimed, a sentiment that resonates strongly with his political base. This statement reflects a deep-seated belief among his supporters that the legal system is being exploited for political ends.

Currently leading in the polls for the Republican nomination, Trump has woven the narrative of these legal challenges into his campaign strategy, portraying them as politically motivated attacks aimed at undermining his candidacy.

The lawsuit originated from Carroll's claim that Trump defamed her by denying allegations of rape. The jury's verdict, including compensatory and punitive damages, significantly exceeded Carroll's initial request for $10 million.

Throughout the proceedings, Trump firmly denied the accusations, maintaining that he had never met Carroll and suggesting she fabricated the story. His legal team presented Carroll as someone seeking fame, suggesting she relished the public attention her accusations brought.

This case adds another layer to Trump's ongoing legal challenges, which include appealing a related $5 million verdict in a similar case. These legal battles, which Trump and his supporters consistently label as unjust and politically motivated, also include various criminal indictments and a civil fraud lawsuit against the Trump Organization.

The trial was marked by Trump's departure during Carroll's lawyer's closing argument, a move interpreted as a silent protest against what he perceives as a biased legal process. His lead defense attorney, Alina Habba, echoed Trump's sentiments, telling reporters, "President Trump is leading in the polls, and now we see what you get in New York," implying a politicized motive behind the jury's decision.

While Carroll and her legal team hailed the verdict as a victory for women's rights, Trump's representation has challenged this view, arguing that Carroll has gained professionally and personally from the publicity surrounding her lawsuit.

The appeal represents more than a legal contest for Trump; it is an integral part of his narrative against what he and many consider a politicized legal system.

Daily Feed

Plaintiff Linkedto Partners LLC Accuses Digital Asset Firm DeFi Technologies Inc. of Securities Fraud

Linkedto Partners LLC has initiated a class-action lawsuit against DeFi Technologies Inc., accusing them of securities fraud by allegedly making false statements about their financial health between May and November of this year.


Plaintiff alleges auto dealer and bank conspired in deceptive financing scheme

In a lawsuit filed on December 5th in Brooklyn's Eastern District Court of New York against Generation Kia Inc., Esran L. Boothe claims he was misled into an inflated car financing deal through deceptive practices involving electronic contracts...


UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce business victimized by fraudsters sues The Moroccan Deal Inc., alleging deceptive investment scheme

In a striking legal move, UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce company based in New York City has filed a lawsuit against The Moroccan Deal Inc., accusing them along with two individuals of orchestrating a fraudulent investment scheme involving...