New York couple sues C.R. Bard over allegedly defective IVC filter that caused severe injuries


Margo Brodie, Chief Judge with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York | Administrative Office of the United States Courts | Wikipedia Commons

A couple from New York has filed a lawsuit against major medical device manufacturer C.R. Bard Incorporated and its subsidiary Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, alleging severe injuries caused by a malfunctioning medical implant.

According to the lawsuit filed by plaintiffs Brenda Ann De Petris and Francis De Petris, the defendants manufactured the Bard Eclipse inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, a device Brenda had implanted on December 16, 2010. The IVC filter is designed to prevent blood clots from reaching the heart and lungs. However, according to the plaintiffs, this device was defectively designed and inadequately tested before being marketed as safe for permanent implantation. They claim that Bard's rush to market led to shortcuts in design and testing processes, resulting in devices prone to fracture, migration, tilt, and perforation—issues that allegedly caused significant harm to Brenda Ann De Petris.

The lawsuit details how Bard aggressively marketed these filters despite knowing about their defects. It accuses Bard of fraudulently misrepresenting the safety of its products both to the FDA and consumers. The plaintiffs allege that Bard falsely claimed its retrievable filters were equivalent in safety to permanent filters already on the market while failing to conduct adequate long-term safety studies. As a result of these alleged failures, Brenda Ann De Petris experienced severe complications: her filter migrated and fractured inside her body, leading to retained filter legs in her pulmonary artery and ventricular myocardium.

The plaintiffs are seeking compensatory damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, as well as punitive damages against Bard for what they describe as willful negligence and fraudulent concealment of product risks. They argue that safer alternative designs existed but were ignored by Bard in favor of maximizing profits.

The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under Case ID 1:25-cv-01437.

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Plaintiff Linkedto Partners LLC Accuses Digital Asset Firm DeFi Technologies Inc. of Securities Fraud

Linkedto Partners LLC has initiated a class-action lawsuit against DeFi Technologies Inc., accusing them of securities fraud by allegedly making false statements about their financial health between May and November of this year.


Plaintiff alleges auto dealer and bank conspired in deceptive financing scheme

In a lawsuit filed on December 5th in Brooklyn's Eastern District Court of New York against Generation Kia Inc., Esran L. Boothe claims he was misled into an inflated car financing deal through deceptive practices involving electronic contracts...


UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce business victimized by fraudsters sues The Moroccan Deal Inc., alleging deceptive investment scheme

In a striking legal move, UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce company based in New York City has filed a lawsuit against The Moroccan Deal Inc., accusing them along with two individuals of orchestrating a fraudulent investment scheme involving...