Ex-NYC workers sue city over vaccine mandate alleging religious discrimination


Margo Brodie, Chief Judge with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York | Administrative Office of the United States Courts | Wikipedia Commons

A group of former New York City employees have filed a class-action lawsuit against the city and unnamed officials, alleging that the city’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate policies violated their religious rights.

The plaintiffs in this case, including Sharon Tunnell, Edison Gbor, and others, were employed by various city departments, such as the Fire Department (FDNY), Police Department (NYPD), Department of Parks & Recreation, and others. They allege that they were denied religious accommodations from the city's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, leading to terminations or forced retirements throughout 2022. Tunnell was terminated from her role as a Fire Protection Inspector on July 27, 2022, while Edison Gbor lost his job as an FDNY firefighter and is now homeless. The plaintiffs argue that these actions violate their fundamental statutory and constitutional rights.

Central to the complaint is the assertion that New York City's policies were discriminatory by categorically excluding most religious objections from protection under its vaccine mandate. The lawsuit accuses the city of violating both federal and state laws designed to protect religious freedoms. It claims that these policies failed to accommodate sincerely held religious beliefs unless they conformed to specific criteria deemed acceptable by city officials. "The Citywide Panel routinely denied people on undue hardship well into late summer of 2022," alleges the complaint, suggesting a systematic disregard for individual religious convictions.

The plaintiffs are seeking several forms of relief from the court: declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent further enforcement of these policies; reinstatement to their former positions; nominal, compensatory, actual, and punitive damages; attorneys’ fees; and other remedies for harms suffered due to what they describe as unconstitutional actions by city authorities.

The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under Case No. 29-1781.

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Plaintiff Linkedto Partners LLC Accuses Digital Asset Firm DeFi Technologies Inc. of Securities Fraud

Linkedto Partners LLC has initiated a class-action lawsuit against DeFi Technologies Inc., accusing them of securities fraud by allegedly making false statements about their financial health between May and November of this year.


Plaintiff alleges auto dealer and bank conspired in deceptive financing scheme

In a lawsuit filed on December 5th in Brooklyn's Eastern District Court of New York against Generation Kia Inc., Esran L. Boothe claims he was misled into an inflated car financing deal through deceptive practices involving electronic contracts...


UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce business victimized by fraudsters sues The Moroccan Deal Inc., alleging deceptive investment scheme

In a striking legal move, UCS Trading Inc., an e-commerce company based in New York City has filed a lawsuit against The Moroccan Deal Inc., accusing them along with two individuals of orchestrating a fraudulent investment scheme involving...